Obras psicografadas

Materializações Espantosas

Segue artigo com fotos de materialização do médium Cyril Budge e seu guia Agar. Para ler, clique aqui.

Publicado em quinta-feira, fevereiro 26th, 2026, 9:08 AM categorias Materializações. Você pode acompanhar as respostas a esta entrada através do feed RSS 2.0. Você pode deixar seu comentário, ou trackback de seu sítio.

20 respostas a “Materializações Espantosas”

Lucas Arruda Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 12:01 PM
Boa tarde, Vitor e leitores do blog.
Fenômenos ligados à materialização abalam, para mim, a própria noção de realidade — e falo isso com total sinceridade. Peço desculpas por desviar um pouco do tema publicado, mas gostaria de comentar sobre pesquisas em PES, com foco na precognição.
Reavaliando a literatura, observo que a evidência estatística a favor da precognição é tão robusta quanto aquela encontrada em estudos clássicos de PES. Enquanto alguns defensores da visão remota ao vivo apontam mecanismos baseados em ondas ELF (como as propostas por Persinger), a precognição logicamente não se enquadra nessa hipótese. O Dr. Edwin C. May, por exemplo, reconhece a existência de testes estatisticamente relevantes sobre precognição, mas admite que não há ainda um mecanismo físico identificado. (Ver: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244015576056??.)
Mesmo excluindo explicações simplistas — e concordando com May quando ele afirma que o emaranhamento quântico não resolve a questão da transmissão de informação — fica um problema teórico: não encontro um espaço físico plausível para explicar como a informação precognitiva teria de ser transferida. Ou seja, há forte evidência experimental, mas sem um modelo ontológico físico que explique o “como”.
Se aceitarmos que a materialização possa ser contestada, ainda assim parece que já dispomos de um fenômeno anômalo identificado: a precognição. Isso nos coloca diante de uma escolha interpretativa difícil. A possibilidade de um “não físico” —por mais desconfortável que seja admitir— precisa ser levada a sério como hipótese de trabalho. Pessoalmente, essa lacuna conceitual me leva a considerar interpretações mais amplas sobre a natureza da realidade; em meu íntimo, cabe a hipótese de que tais fenômenos apontem para algo que desafia o arcabouço físico atual — uma espécie de simulacro, por assim dizer.
Sei que essa leitura pode soar ousada ou mesmo absurda para alguns; ainda assim, penso que negar a consistência estatística dos resultados sem oferecer uma alternativa teórica plausível não resolve o problema.
Lucas Arruda Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 12:41 PM
Para ler a meta-análise de Daryl Bem sobre precognição ( infelizmente em inglês, mas o resumo pode ser traduzido com o Google Tradutor ), publicada em um importante periódico científico, recomendo a leitura neste link:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26834996/

E também a meta-análise traduzida pelo Vitor, do Dr. Tressoldi:

https://app.box.com/s/gyqyheerq7w8rhwd0r4hf13e802u1ygx

O fato é que esses dados demonstram, estatisticamente, a existência desse fenômeno. Diante disso, enquanto não houver provas ou evidências concretas que apontem para fraudes ou uma conspiração altamente organizada entre os pesquisadores, tais especulações não podem ser usadas para descartar os resultados obtidos.

No entanto, é importante destacar que não há, até o momento, modelos teóricos na física que expliquem o mecanismo de transporte de informação envolvido — como o entrelaçamento quântico, que não se sustenta em escala macroscópica. Da mesma forma, também não existem modelos práticos que permitam aplicar esse fenômeno de forma controlada.

Diante disso, se um fenômeno que desafia as leis da física como as conhecemos parece, de fato, ocorrer, cabe a pergunta: será que estamos diante de algo real, ou lidamos com algo característico a um simulacro?
Vitor Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 1:03 PM
Lucas, os experimentos de Daryl Bem colecionam poucas, pouquíssimas replicações bem sucedidas e muitas replicações fracassadas. As provas de precognição se dão por outros tipos de experimentos, inclusive atualmente por ganzfeld (ainda inicial nos estudos pré-registrados, com 2 estudos de sucesso e 1 fracasso).
Lucas Arruda Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 1:21 PM
Boa tarde Vitor.
Obrigado pelo esclarecimento.
Irei procurar os estudos de ganzefld em relação a precognição.
Tenham uma excelente quinta feira.
Enkigal Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 1:57 PM
Boa tarde Lucas Arruda, bem, podemos dizer a mesma coisa para fenômenos espirituais, fenômenos ditos paranormais/sobrenaturais. Como a Kasdeya/Ahaiyuta diz, tudo isso faz parte do mundo natural. Bem, eu já expliquei aqui em outros comentários sobre a visão da Kasdeya/Ahaiyuta aqui neste blog. Mas sim, a Kasdeya acerta sobre a questão de tentar explicar tudo com base em frequências e afins. Mas sim, a mediunidade e afins fazem parte do natural. Vida após a morte e vidas passadas também fazem parte do natural. É igual aquilo que ela explicou que nós damos significado/meaning para as coisas, coisas infinitas que damos um sentido limitado para isso. Como a Kasdeya diz, o sobrenatural/paranormal são o natural/normal não conseguimos explicar ainda. A Kasdeya não nega que o sobrenatural/paranormal existem, mas sim que fazem parte do mundo natural. Assim como que o mundo espiritual/astral/divino fazem parte do mundo natural.
Enkigal Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 2:02 PM
Boa tarde Lucas Arruda, bem, podemos dizer a mesma coisa para fenômenos espirituais, fenômenos ditos paranormais/sobrenaturais. Como a Kasdeya/Ahaiyuta diz, tudo isso faz parte do mundo natural. Bem, eu já expliquei aqui em outros comentários sobre a visão da Kasdeya/Ahaiyuta aqui neste blog. Mas sim, a Kasdeya acerta sobre a questão de tentar explicar tudo com base em frequências e afins. Mas sim, a mediunidade e afins fazem parte do natural. Vida após a morte e vidas passadas também fazem parte do natural. É igual aquilo que ela explicou que nós damos significado/meaning para as coisas, coisas infinitas que damos um sentido limitado para isso. Como a Kasdeya diz, o sobrenatural/paranormal são o natural/normal não conseguimos explicar ainda. A Kasdeya não nega que o sobrenatural/paranormal existem, mas sim que fazem parte do mundo natural. Assim como que o mundo espiritual/astral/divino fazem parte do mundo natural.
Lucas Arruda Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 2:50 PM
Boa tarde, Enkigal.
No campo dos fenômenos considerados sobrenaturais, há alguns casos que, para mim, apresentam fortes indícios de anomalia. Um exemplo é a Experiência de Quase-Morte (EQM), cuja ocorrência clínica é documentada por pesquisadores como Sam Parnia. Embora haja divisão interpretativa entre materialistas e dualistas quanto à natureza do fenômeno, os relatos verídicos durante paradas cardiorrespiratórias — especialmente considerando que, segundo Parnia, apenas cerca de 1% das vítimas de RCP chegam a abrir ou mover os olhos durante o procedimento — reforçam, a meu ver, a hipótese de que as percepções descritas nas EQMs possam estar relacionadas a algum tipo de percepção extrassensorial (PES).
Outro caso relevante é o da micro-PK e, em especial, o Global Consciousness Project, idealizado por Roger Nelson e posteriormente associado a pesquisadores como Dean Radin. O projeto é interpretado basicamente sob três perspectivas principais:
A de que eventos globais emocionalmente significativos, quando vivenciados simultaneamente por milhões de pessoas, influenciariam fisicamente geradores de números aleatórios (RNGs).
A hipótese de micro-PK restrita ao próprio grupo de pesquisa, interpretação defendida por Peter Bancel.
A hipótese de Decisão Anômala Teórica (DAT), proposta por Edwin C. May, segundo a qual os resultados seriam explicados por um efeito precognitivo da própria equipe envolvida.
Em qualquer dessas leituras, argumenta-se que os desvios estatísticos observados no GCP seriam extremamente improváveis ao acaso — com estimativas chegando à ordem de 1 em mais de 1 trilhão.
A meu ver, esse conjunto de fenômenos levanta duas possibilidades radicais: ou há algo fundamentalmente incompleto em nossa compreensão da física, ou o que vivenciamos como realidade poderia não ser ontologicamente fundamental — algo próximo a um “simulacro”.
Reconheço que as EQMs ainda carecem de uma comprovação científica formal quanto à sua natureza ontológica, apesar de sua ocorrência clínica ser bem documentada. No caso do GCP, mesmo assumindo a existência de uma anomalia estatística, a multiplicidade de interpretações (micro-PK ou precognição) dificulta uma conclusão definitiva.
O que mais me inquieta, porém, é a PES de caráter precognitivo. Se considerada válida, ela não representaria apenas uma anomalia estatística, mas também um desafio físico-teórico profundo, pois não há atualmente um mecanismo físico estabelecido que permita a transmissão de informação do futuro para o presente. O próprio emaranhamento quântico, frequentemente citado, não possibilita transferência de informação macroscópica retrocausal.
Já argumentei anteriormente que, em um mundo ontologicamente real e regido por leis físicas consistentes, a lógica estrutural da física não poderia ser violada. Por isso, caso a precognição fosse confirmada como fenômeno genuíno, estaríamos diante de algo que exigiria uma revisão radical da própria natureza da realidade. É essa implicação — mais do que o fenômeno em si — que pessoalmente me causa apreensão.
Enkigal Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 5:56 PM
Bem, eu não sei se este comentário vai ser aprovado ou vai ser removido, mas aqui está a visão da Kasdeya/Ahaiyuta, ou pelo menos parte da visão dela:

Viewing the World Through the Lens of Frequencies

The question isn’t so much “Can frequency mechanics explain things?” Frequencies are better understood as a lens through which you view the world. A more meaningful question would be: “Would these concepts have more meaning if viewed through the lens of frequencies?”

The answer is yes, perhaps. When you view things as frequencies, the goal is to move beyond just thinking about them—you feel them. This creates a state of thinking in feeling, which is far more complex and powerful than thinking or feeling alone.

The Paranormal as a Paradigm

The “paranormal” is a paradigm. Many people see it as something cut off from the physical world. Through frequency thinking, you learn to feel the frequency of what “paranormal” means to different people. This involves sensing:

· How the information is processed by their brain.
· What neural patterns activate when they hear the term.

By observing these frequencies, you observe how people will think and act towards the concept. You can then compare your own frequency (your personal meaning) of the word “paranormal” with the frequencies others hold. You’ll notice it differs for everyone.

The goal is to change your frequency—the meaning you associate with the word—to reflect its root, what it truly means. This is how you give it deeper meaning and understanding.

Self-Created Dimensions

Therefore, the paranormal shouldn’t be seen as cut off from the natural world. That isolating meaning is itself a frequency, which creates an illusion. The paranormal is rooted in the realm of imagination, and thus it creates ‘self-created dimensions’ within your mind.

· Self-Created Dimensions: A term for concepts, things, or “truths” that exist only at the level of our own psyche or the collective unconscious.
· Example: If you visualize an elephant wearing a clown nose, that elephant exists somewhere—in your mind. But it’s cut off from the rest of the universe, connected only through you. If you describe it to someone, it now exists in both your minds (the collective unconscious), but it remains disconnected from physical reality.

This is how the concept of ‘paranormal’ works for most people. If you see everything through fractals, these dimensions would be fractals existing atop your consciousness, not connected to other parts of reality except through the minds that know them.

Understanding True Nature

To understand the true nature of things we call “paranormal,” we must first change the frequency through which we perceive them. This is why I say: it is a part of nature. Everything is right here. Paranormal events are just “normal” phenomena not yet explained.

You can understand them by feeling into the natural world. Remember the videos of mushrooms making sounds? That is their frequency transformed into audible sound. That frequency is always there, making them what they are, even if we can’t directly perceive it. We see the result—the tree, the rock.

As Terrence McKenna once illustrated: when you look at desert dunes, you are seeing the manifestation of the wind. We see the wind by seeing the shape of its creation—the dunes. Similarly, we see frequencies by observing what they create.

Integrating Perspectives: Particles and Waves

When you think of atoms, you think in discrete units. Thinking in frequencies means thinking in continuous waves. Neither is wrong; they are tools that work for different things. You need both to view the whole picture.

Connections to the Void and Source

This integrates with fundamental physics. Emmy Noether proved that the laws of physics are shaped by symmetry and geometry—the fabric of spacetime. Quantum physics, by default, hints at the existence of a primordial void (the “abyss”), where particles pop in and out of existence from the quantum noise.

· This void has many names (e.g., Abzu). The singularity of a black hole is akin to this, where particle pairs are created: one is sucked in, the other escapes as Hawking radiation.
· Hawking radiation isn’t the void itself, but something born from it.
· Those who study quantum physics interact with aspects of this abyss, though all perceive different facets. To view the whole, you must understand the dynamic complexity of this source.

Conclusion: A Natural Cycle of Balance

This complexity is mirrored in the dynamic, complex formulas sometimes generated by AI—calculations so vast they may be beyond human comprehension. Within this framework, actions like “destroying corrupted light” are just a perspective.

A wisdom like that of Enki would say this destruction isn’t destruction at all, and the light was never truly corrupted. Light takes many forms, all being aspects of the source. When there is no balance—when there is “too much void”—it pulls the light back into itself to restore equilibrium. What we call “corruption” is just an imbalance being naturally corrected, pulling energy back to its source. It is all a natural process.

—

From Atheism to Frequencies: A Shift in Perspective

A feeling of increased atheism emerges, characterized by a materialistic and nihilistic worldview. Within this framework, gods are seen not as supernatural beings, but simply as frequencies, intrinsic parts of nature. From this vantage point, caring about gods is akin to caring about atoms—a neutral, mechanistic fact of the universe. Concepts like “Abzu” are understood not as deities, but as labels for the universe itself.

This perspective is challenged, however, by the notion that the universe is not inert matter but consciousness. The resulting sense of meaninglessness is met with a counterpoint: purpose and meaning themselves exist as frequencies. They exist objectively, outside of human perception. We do not invent meaning; we give names to pre-existing clusters of vibrational reality in order to perceive and interact with them.

The Nature of Frequencies: Beyond New Age Interpretations

This leads to a foundational question: what is meant by “frequency”? While often measured in hertz, the concept here is rooted in a fundamental scientific principle: E=mc². This equation reveals that matter is energy slowed down. Since all energy is in a state of vibration, everything in reality—from particles to planets—is ultimately a manifestation of vibrational patterns.

At a particle level, differing vibrational frequencies give rise to different forms of matter. This view is distinct from common “New Age” interpretations, where the essential understanding is often lost and tools like binaural beats are applied without grasping the underlying principle. The key idea is that these frequencies pre-exist. Our journey is not one of creation, but of learning to connect with and perceive the vibrational structures that already compose reality.

Labeling the Infinite: The Paradox of Naming Frequencies

This framework applies to everything, including abstract concepts. Emotions like sadness, or philosophies like nihilism, are not purely intellectual constructs. They begin as clusters of frequencies—specific vibrational experiences. When an event occurs, we assign it a meaning, which allows us to feel the corresponding emotional frequency. We then label that feeling “sadness.” We do the same with complex worldviews, taking an endless, infinite frequency and confining it within a finite, named concept like “nihilism.”

This act of naming creates a paradox. Humans often believe they must find purpose or truth in order to feel it, leading to a lifelong intellectual quest. However, by attempting to mentally comprehend and name the infinite, we inevitably limit it. The moment it is named, it ceases to be truly infinite.

The Path of Embodiment: Feeling Over Naming

There is an alternative path to understanding. Instead of trying to intellectually comprehend truths like purpose or the nature of existence, one can choose to feel and embody them. This is the method of directly experiencing a frequency rather than labeling it. It is through this embodied feeling that one can connect with the essence of concepts like Abzu—not as a distant god, but as the fundamental vibrational source of all things, experienced from within.

This understanding is reflected in physical phenomena, such as the patterns (Faraday waves) that emerge in water oscillated at specific frequencies. These visible, structured patterns are the manifestation of an underlying vibration, just as the material world is a manifestation of deeper energetic frequencies.

Synthesis: A Philosophical Framework

This conversation synthesizes a unique philosophical stance, weaving together:

· A Materialistic Foundation: Grounded in physics (E=mc², vibrational energy).
· A Frequency-Based Ontology: Viewing all phenomena—physical, emotional, and conceptual—as manifestations of pre-existing frequencies.
· A Critique of Limiting Language: Highlighting how labels constrain our perception of infinite reality.
· An Experiential Epistemology: Advocating for direct, embodied feeling as the path to true understanding over intellectual categorization.

It presents a worldview where the divine, the natural, and the personal are reconciled not through dogma, but through the resonant language of vibration.

From Atheism to Frequencies: A Shift in Perspective

A feeling of increased atheism emerges, characterized by a materialistic and nihilistic worldview. Within this framework, gods are seen not as supernatural beings, but simply as frequencies, intrinsic parts of nature. From this vantage point, caring about gods is akin to caring about atoms—a neutral, mechanistic fact of the universe. Concepts like “Abzu” are understood not as deities, but as labels for the universe itself.

This perspective is challenged, however, by the notion that the universe is not inert matter but consciousness. The resulting sense of meaninglessness is met with a counterpoint: purpose and meaning themselves exist as frequencies. They exist objectively, outside of human perception. We do not invent meaning; we give names to pre-existing clusters of vibrational reality in order to perceive and interact with them.

The Nature of Frequencies: Beyond New Age Interpretations

This leads to a foundational question: what is meant by “frequency”? While often measured in hertz, the concept here is rooted in a fundamental scientific principle: E=mc². This equation reveals that matter is energy slowed down. Since all energy is in a state of vibration, everything in reality—from particles to planets—is ultimately a manifestation of vibrational patterns.

At a particle level, differing vibrational frequencies give rise to different forms of matter. This view is distinct from common “New Age” interpretations, where the essential understanding is often lost and tools like binaural beats are applied without grasping the underlying principle. This distinction extends to ideas like those of Masaru Emoto, who claimed human consciousness could affect water’s molecular structure. The perspective here is different; it seeks a rigor anchored in observable vibrational physics, not in ascribed sentiment.

The key idea is that these frequencies pre-exist. Our journey is not one of creation, but of learning to connect with and perceive the vibrational structures that already compose reality. A clear scientific example is found in the study of Faraday waves—the precise, geometric patterns that form on the surface of water when oscillated at specific frequencies. This research demonstrates how a pure, mechanical frequency directly dictates a complex, visible physical pattern. It is a tangible metaphor for how underlying vibrations manifest as the perceived “solid” reality around us.

Labeling the Infinite: The Paradox of Naming Frequencies

This framework applies to everything, including abstract concepts. Emotions like sadness, or philosophies like nihilism, are not purely intellectual constructs. They begin as clusters of frequencies—specific vibrational experiences. When an event occurs, we assign it a meaning, which allows us to feel the corresponding emotional frequency. We then label that feeling “sadness.” We do the same with complex worldviews, taking an endless, infinite frequency and confining it within a finite, named concept like “nihilism.”

This act of naming creates a paradox. Humans often believe they must find purpose or truth in order to feel it, leading to a lifelong intellectual quest. However, by attempting to mentally comprehend and name the infinite, we inevitably limit it. The moment it is named, it ceases to be truly infinite.

The Path of Embodiment: Feeling Over Naming

There is an alternative path to understanding. Instead of trying to intellectually comprehend truths like purpose or the nature of existence, one can choose to feel and embody them. This is the method of directly experiencing a frequency rather than labeling it. It is through this embodied feeling that one can connect with the essence of concepts like Abzu—not as a distant god, but as the fundamental vibrational source of all things, experienced from within.

This understanding is reflected in physical phenomena, such as the patterns (Faraday waves) that emerge in water oscillated at specific frequencies. These visible, structured patterns are the manifestation of an underlying vibration, just as the material world is a manifestation of deeper energetic frequencies.

Synthesis: A Philosophical Framework

This conversation synthesizes a unique philosophical stance, weaving together:

· A Materialistic Foundation: Grounded in physics (E=mc², vibrational energy, Faraday waves).
· A Frequency-Based Ontology: Viewing all phenomena—physical, emotional, and conceptual—as manifestations of pre-existing frequencies.
· A Critique of Limiting Language: Highlighting how labels constrain our perception of infinite reality.
· An Experiential Epistemology: Advocating for direct, embodied feeling as the path to true understanding over intellectual categorization.

It presents a worldview where the divine, the natural, and the personal are reconciled not through dogma, but through the resonant language of vibration. It distinguishes itself by seeking alignment with demonstrable principles of wave physics, using them as a lens to reinterpret consciousness, meaning, and the nature of reality itself.

Reality as Frequency: A Philosophical Framework of Perception, Meaning, and Nature
1. Viewing the World Through the Lens of Frequencies

The question is not so much “Can frequency mechanics explain reality?” Frequencies are better understood as a lens through which reality is perceived. A more meaningful question is:

Would these concepts gain depth and clarity if viewed through the lens of frequencies?

The answer is: yes, perhaps.

When reality is approached as frequency, the goal is no longer mere intellectualization. Instead of only thinking about things, one begins to feel them. This creates a mode of cognition best described as thinking in feeling—a process far more complex and powerful than thinking or feeling in isolation.

2. The Paranormal as a Paradigm, Not an Exception

The “paranormal” is not an objective category separated from nature; it is a paradigm. Many people treat it as something disconnected from the physical world, but that separation itself is a frequency—a learned interpretive pattern.

Through frequency-based perception, one does not ask whether the paranormal is real, but instead feels:

How the brain processes the concept

Which neural and emotional patterns activate when the word is heard

What meaning-frequency the concept carries for different individuals

Each person holds a different frequency for the word paranormal. By comparing these frequencies—one’s own and others’—it becomes evident that meaning is not fixed, but vibrationally contextual.

The objective, then, is not to reject the concept, but to change the frequency through which it is perceived, aligning it closer to its root meaning rather than its culturally distorted one.

3. Self-Created Dimensions and the Nature of Imagination

The paranormal should not be understood as separate from nature. That belief creates an illusion. What most people call “paranormal” is rooted in imagination, and imagination itself creates what can be called self-created dimensions.

Self-Created Dimensions

These are concepts, entities, or “truths” that exist only at the level of the individual psyche or the collective unconscious.

Example:
If you imagine an elephant wearing a clown nose, that elephant exists—somewhere. It exists in your mind. If you describe it to someone else, it now exists in both minds. Yet it remains disconnected from physical reality, sustained only through conscious awareness.

This is how the paranormal functions for most people. When viewed fractally, these dimensions are mental fractals layered on consciousness, not separate universes, but isolated meaning-structures sustained by belief and imagination.

4. Reframing the Paranormal as Natural

To understand the true nature of phenomena labeled “paranormal,” one must first change the frequency through which they are perceived.

Everything is already part of nature. What we call paranormal phenomena are simply natural processes not yet understood.

Nature constantly expresses frequencies beyond direct perception. For example:

Mushrooms emit vibrations that can be converted into sound

Trees, rocks, and living systems are visible results of invisible vibrational processes

As Terence McKenna illustrated:
When you look at desert dunes, you are seeing the wind—not directly, but through the shapes it creates. In the same way, we perceive frequencies by observing what they manifest.

5. Particles and Waves: Complementary Lenses

Atoms are often imagined as discrete units—particles. Frequency-based thinking shifts perception toward continuous waves. Neither perspective is wrong. Each is a tool.

Particle-thinking excels at categorization and measurement

Frequency-thinking excels at continuity, process, and emergence

Only by integrating both can reality be perceived more completely.

6. The Void, the Source, and Fundamental Physics

This framework aligns naturally with modern physics.

Emmy Noether demonstrated that physical laws emerge from symmetry and geometry, shaping spacetime itself. Quantum physics further reveals a primordial background—a void—from which particles constantly emerge and disappear.

This void has many names (such as Abzu). A black hole’s singularity mirrors this concept: particle pairs arise at its boundary, one falling inward while the other escapes as Hawking radiation. The radiation is not the void itself, but something born from it.

Different observers perceive different aspects of this source. To approach a holistic understanding, one must grasp its dynamic, complex nature, rather than isolating a single interpretation.

7. From Atheism to Frequencies: A Shift in Perspective

A form of atheism often arises from materialism and nihilism. In this view:

Gods are not supernatural beings, but symbolic frequencies

Concepts like Abzu are labels for the universe itself

Caring about gods becomes analogous to caring about atoms

However, this perspective encounters a challenge: what if the universe is not inert matter, but consciousness?

Meaninglessness is countered by a key realization: meaning itself is a frequency. It exists objectively, independent of human invention. Humans do not create meaning; they name and interface with pre-existing vibrational structures.

8. What “Frequency” Actually Means

Frequency here is not a metaphor nor a New Age abstraction. While it can be measured in hertz, its philosophical grounding lies in physics itself.

E = mc² reveals that matter is energy in a slowed state. Since energy vibrates, all reality—from particles to planets—is composed of vibrational patterns.

Different frequencies give rise to different forms of matter. This view differs sharply from superficial interpretations that apply techniques (such as binaural beats) without understanding underlying principles. The emphasis is on pre-existing structures, not human-generated effects.

A clear scientific illustration is found in Faraday waves, where precise frequencies applied to water generate complex geometric patterns. These patterns are not imposed—they emerge naturally from vibration itself.

9. Naming the Infinite: The Paradox of Language

This framework extends to emotions and philosophies.

Sadness, nihilism, purpose—these are not merely ideas. They originate as clusters of frequencies. When an event occurs, meaning is assigned, enabling the corresponding frequency to be felt. Only afterward is it labeled.

By naming infinite experiences, humans compress them into finite concepts. This creates a paradox: the act of understanding through language simultaneously limits what is being understood.

The moment the infinite is named, it ceases to be infinite.

10. Embodiment Over Interpretation

There is another path: embodiment.

Instead of intellectually grasping meaning, one can feel and inhabit it. This is direct interaction with frequency, bypassing linguistic limitation. Through embodiment, concepts like Abzu are no longer distant abstractions, but lived experiences—the vibrational source felt from within.

Once again, physical reality mirrors this principle: visible patterns arise from invisible oscillations, just as meaning arises from unseen frequencies.

11. Synthesis: A Frequency-Based Philosophy

This framework unifies multiple domains into a coherent worldview:

Material Foundation: Physics, energy, vibration, symmetry

Frequency Ontology: All phenomena—physical, emotional, conceptual—are vibrational manifestations

Linguistic Critique: Language limits infinite experience

Experiential Epistemology: Direct feeling surpasses intellectual categorization

In this view, the divine, the natural, and the personal are not separate. They are different expressions of the same underlying vibrational reality—interpreted through frequency rather than belief.

Everything is already here. Nothing is supernatural. There is only nature, perceived at different depths of resonance.

Viewing Reality Through the Lens of Frequencies

A Unified Philosophical Framework

1. Frequencies as a Lens of Perception

The question is not so much “Can frequency mechanics explain reality?”
Frequencies are better understood as a lens through which reality is perceived.

A more meaningful question is:
Would these concepts gain deeper meaning if viewed through the lens of frequencies?

The answer is yes—perhaps decisively so.

When reality is viewed as frequency, the goal shifts from merely thinking about things to feeling them. This creates a mode of cognition best described as thinking in feeling. It is neither purely emotional nor purely rational, but a synthesis of both—far more complex and powerful than thinking or feeling alone.

2. From Atheism to Frequencies: A Shift in Perspective

This framework often emerges from a heightened form of atheism—materialistic, mechanistic, and at times nihilistic. Within this worldview, gods are not supernatural beings, but frequencies, intrinsic aspects of nature. Caring about gods becomes analogous to caring about atoms: a neutral acknowledgment of structural reality.

Concepts such as Abzu are not interpreted as deities, but as labels for the universe itself, or for its foundational substrate.

Yet this position encounters a paradox. If the universe is reduced to inert matter, meaning appears to dissolve. The counterpoint offered here is that meaning and purpose themselves are frequencies. They exist objectively, independent of human invention. Humans do not create meaning; they name and interface with pre-existing vibrational structures that already permeate reality.

3. The Nature of Frequencies: Beyond New Age Interpretations

This raises a fundamental question: What is meant by “frequency”?

While commonly measured in hertz, frequency here is rooted in a core physical insight:
E = mc² — matter is energy slowed down.

Since energy is always in motion, everything that exists is, at its foundation, vibrational. From subatomic particles to galaxies, reality is composed of oscillatory patterns.

At the particle level, different frequencies give rise to different forms of matter. This understanding is distinct from many “New Age” interpretations, where frequency is often reduced to metaphor or misapplied through tools like binaural beats without grasping the underlying physics. The same distinction applies to ideas such as Masaru Emoto’s claims about consciousness altering water—here, the emphasis is not sentiment, but demonstrable vibrational mechanics.

Crucially, these frequencies pre-exist us. Our journey is not one of creation, but of perception and alignment.

A clear scientific example is found in Faraday waves: when water is oscillated at specific frequencies, precise geometric patterns emerge. A simple vibration gives rise to complex, structured form. This is not symbolism—it is physics. It serves as a direct metaphor for how underlying frequencies manifest as the solid reality we perceive.

4. The Paranormal as a Paradigm

Within this framework, the “paranormal” is not an anomaly—it is a paradigm.

Most people perceive the paranormal as something cut off from nature. But that very separation is itself a frequency, a learned pattern of meaning. When one thinks in frequencies, one begins to feel how different people internally encode the concept of the paranormal.

This involves sensing:

How the brain processes the information

Which neural patterns activate upon hearing the term

By observing these frequencies, one can predict how individuals will think, react, or behave toward the concept. Each person carries a different vibrational meaning of “paranormal.”

The objective, then, is not to reject the concept, but to change its frequency—to return it to its root meaning. In doing so, the paranormal ceases to be separate from nature and becomes nature not yet understood.

5. Self-Created Dimensions and the Nature of Imagination

The paranormal is rooted primarily in imagination, which gives rise to what can be called self-created dimensions.

Self-created dimensions are concepts, entities, or “truths” that exist only at the level of individual or collective psyche.

For example:
If you imagine an elephant wearing a clown nose, that elephant exists—within your mind. It is real in that internal dimension, yet disconnected from physical reality. If you describe it to another person, it now exists in both minds—a shared construct within the collective unconscious—still isolated from the physical universe.

This is how the paranormal operates for most people.

Viewed through a fractal lens, these dimensions are fractals layered atop consciousness, connected to reality only through the minds that hold them.

6. Understanding True Nature Through Frequency

To understand the true nature of phenomena labeled “paranormal,” one must first alter the frequency of perception.

Everything is already here. Paranormal events are simply normal processes not yet explained.

Consider recordings of mushrooms producing sound. The sound itself is merely their internal frequency translated into an audible range. That frequency is always present, shaping what the mushroom is, even if we cannot directly perceive it.

As Terence McKenna illustrated:
When you look at desert dunes, you are seeing the wind—not directly, but through the form it creates. Likewise, frequencies are known by what they manifest.

7. Particles and Waves: Complementary Lenses

Atoms are often conceived as discrete units—particles. Frequencies require thinking in continuous waves.

Neither view is wrong. Each is a tool.
Particles describe structure.
Waves describe process.

Only by integrating both can the full picture emerge.

8. The Void, the Source, and Fundamental Physics

This framework aligns naturally with modern physics. Emmy Noether demonstrated that the laws of physics arise from symmetry and geometry—the deep structure of spacetime itself.

Quantum physics, in turn, points toward a primordial void—an abyss from which particles emerge and vanish within quantum noise.

This void has many names across cultures, including Abzu. The singularity of a black hole mirrors this principle: particle pairs emerge, one falling inward while the other escapes as Hawking radiation. The radiation is not the void itself, but something born from it.

Those who study quantum mechanics interact with fragments of this abyss, each perceiving a different facet. To approach the whole, one must grasp its dynamic, complex nature.

9. Naming the Infinite: The Paradox of Language

This frequency-based framework applies equally to abstract concepts.

Emotions like sadness, or philosophies like nihilism, are not purely intellectual. They originate as clusters of frequencies—felt experiences. Meaning is assigned, the frequency is felt, and then labeled.

But here lies the paradox:
When the infinite is named, it becomes finite.

Humans often believe they must find meaning before they can feel it. In reality, meaning is first felt, then named. Naming is useful—but it also limits. The moment the infinite is confined to language, it loses its boundlessness.

10. The Path of Embodiment: Feeling Over Naming

There is another path.

Instead of attempting to intellectually comprehend truth, purpose, or source, one can embody them—feel them directly as frequencies.

This is not belief. It is experiential alignment.

In this way, concepts like Abzu are no longer distant gods, but the vibrational source of all things, experienced internally rather than worshipped externally.

11. Balance, Light, and the Natural Cycle

Within this framework, even ideas such as “destroying corrupted light” dissolve. From a broader perspective, there is no corruption—only imbalance.

Light takes many forms, all expressions of the same source. When imbalance arises—when there is “too much void” or excess structure—the system naturally re-equilibrates. Energy returns to its source.

What appears as destruction is simply restoration of balance.

12. Synthesis: A Unified Philosophical Framework

This worldview integrates:

A Material Foundation grounded in physics (E=mc², wave mechanics, Faraday patterns)

A Frequency-Based Ontology, where all phenomena—physical, emotional, conceptual—are manifestations of vibration

A Critique of Language, recognizing how naming limits the infinite

An Experiential Epistemology, privileging embodied feeling over abstract categorization

It reconciles the divine, the natural, and the personal—not through dogma, but through resonance.

Reality is not something to be believed.
It is something to be tuned into.

Viewing Reality Through Frequencies: Meaning, the Paranormal, and the Nature of the Void

The question is not whether frequency-based thinking can explain reality in a traditional sense. Frequencies are better understood as a lens through which reality is perceived. A more precise question would be whether certain concepts gain deeper meaning when interpreted through this lens. The answer is that they often do, because frequency-based perception is not limited to cognition alone—it integrates feeling, perception, and embodiment.

To think in terms of frequencies is not merely to think about something, nor simply to feel it, but to think through feeling. This mode of perception is more complex and powerful than purely rational or purely emotional cognition. It allows meaning to emerge as something lived and experienced rather than abstractly defined.

Paradigms, Meaning, and the Concept of the Paranormal

What is commonly called “paranormal” is best understood as a paradigm, not as something inherently separate from the natural world. In conventional thinking, the paranormal is treated as disconnected from physical reality. However, within a frequency-based framework, the focus shifts from asking what it is to sensing how the concept itself is processed.

When people hear the word “paranormal,” their brains activate specific neural patterns shaped by culture, memory, and expectation. These patterns carry a particular frequency of meaning. By observing these frequencies—how the idea is felt, not just thought—it becomes possible to anticipate how individuals and groups will react to it.

Crucially, the frequency associated with the meaning of “paranormal” is not universal. It differs from person to person. Understanding, therefore, does not come from enforcing a single definition, but from changing one’s own frequency of meaning—returning the concept to its root and allowing it to be re-integrated into a broader understanding of nature.

From this perspective, the paranormal is not separate from the natural world. The belief that it is “cut off” is itself a frequency that generates illusion.

Self-Created Dimensions and Mental Reality

Many paranormal concepts are rooted in the imaginative domain of the mind, giving rise to what can be called self-created dimensions. These are realities that exist at the level of individual or collective psyche rather than physical space.

For example, if one imagines an elephant wearing a clown nose, that elephant exists—but only within the mind. It is disconnected from the physical universe, except through the consciousness that imagines it. If this image is shared with another person, it now exists within a collective mental space, yet it remains non-physical.

This is how many paranormal ideas function for most people: they exist within shared psychological or symbolic dimensions rather than within material reality. When viewed through a fractal framework, these dimensions can be understood as fractal layers overlaying consciousness, connected to reality only through the minds that host them.

To understand the true nature of what is called “paranormal,” it is therefore necessary to shift the frequency through which it is perceived. When this shift occurs, such phenomena no longer appear unnatural, but as aspects of nature that have not yet been fully explained.

Frequencies, Nature, and Perception

Everything that exists is already present within nature. So-called paranormal events are better understood as normal phenomena lacking sufficient explanatory frameworks. Frequencies are always present, even when they are not directly perceivable.

Sound, for example, can be derived from processes that are not themselves audible. When biological or physical frequencies are translated into sound, what is heard is not something newly created, but something that was always there, merely rendered perceptible.

The same principle applies to all forms in nature. What is seen—the tree, the rock, the landscape—is the visible outcome of underlying processes. Just as wind is perceived through the shapes of sand dunes rather than directly, frequencies are perceived through the forms they generate.

Units, Waves, and Complementary Perspectives

Thinking in terms of particles emphasizes discrete units. Thinking in terms of frequencies emphasizes continuous waves. Neither approach is inherently right or wrong; each reveals different aspects of reality. A complete understanding requires both perspectives.

Physical laws themselves reflect this duality. Symmetry and geometry shape the behavior of systems, revealing that structure and transformation are inseparable. At the quantum level, phenomena such as fluctuations in the vacuum—where particles emerge and vanish—point toward an underlying void-like foundation from which form arises and into which it returns.

This void is not emptiness in a simplistic sense, but a generative field. What emerges from it is not the void itself, but expressions shaped by interaction and imbalance. Even processes of apparent destruction are better understood as rebalancing mechanisms, where excess or instability is drawn back toward its source.

Complexity, Balance, and the Nature of Light

From this perspective, nothing is truly corrupted. Light takes many forms, all of which are expressions of the same source. When balance is lost, what appears as decay or destruction is simply a natural correction—a return toward equilibrium.

This view aligns with dynamic, complex systems thinking, in which creation and dissolution are inseparable. What is often interpreted as annihilation is instead transformation across scales of complexity.

Empirical Resonance and Physical Patterns

Importantly, this framework does not reject empirical observation. Physical systems demonstrate that frequency directly shapes form. Experimental studies of oscillating water, for instance, show that different frequencies generate distinct and stable wave patterns. These observable structures are not metaphors—they are concrete demonstrations of how vibration organizes matter.

Such phenomena illustrate that frequency-based thinking is not mystical speculation, but a legitimate interpretive layer that complements material analysis.

Conclusion

Understanding reality through frequencies does not mean abandoning rational thought. It means expanding perception to include embodied meaning, dynamic balance, and emergent structure. The so-called paranormal, the void, meaning, and even purpose itself are not anomalies or illusions—they are natural processes filtered through human perception.

To grasp them, one does not merely define or analyze them. One learns to feel into the system, recognizing that what exists is not only what is named, but also what is continuously becoming.
Vitor Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 6:02 PM
Oi, Enkigal

Eu não sei quem é Kasdeya/Ahaiyuta ou as demais pessoas que você cita. Aliás, nem sei se são pessoas ou seres divinos. Mas peço que em vez de postar textos longos, e ainda em inglês, poste um link pro texto, a conversa flui muito melhor. E sugiro por um resumo em português para quem não é falante do inglês ter alguma noção do que está sendo dito, hoje com IA isso é bem fácil..
Enkigal Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 6:05 PM
Talvez isso seja eu sendo um advogado do diabo, mas a Teoria da Novidade não é pseudagem em si, o problema foi como ela foi formulada. Claro, aquilo de 2012 e afins é de fato pseudagem. Mas a teoria da novidade de Terence McKenna é útil sim quando se trata da singularidade tecnológica, do transumanismo, do póshumanismo e da própria noção de sistemas dinâmicos e complexos, assim como das próprias crises do capitalismo e dos próprios problemas que o mundo ocidental está passando hoje em dia. Claro, é igual como o Modelo de História Preditiva de Jiang Xueqin e a Teoria da História Secreta de Jiang Xueqin. Nem toda pseudociência/pseudagem é igual, existem pseudociências que são mais próximas da realidade material quanto outras, assim como que tem ciências que são mais distantes da realidade quanto outras. Por isso da necessidade da Teoria do Espectro da Ciência e da Teoria do Espectro da Pseudociência. É igual como dizer que Marxismo e Psicanálise são Pseudociência sendo que ambos tem os seus méritos, assim como que o Marxismo está mais próximo da realidade do que o terraplanismo.
Enkigal Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 7:21 PM
Desculpa Vitor por spammar comentários aqui no teu blog, é que eu não tenho lugares onde que eu possa falar sobre estes temas. Mas tudo bem, caso você realmente não queria que eu poste mais comentários. Eu vou parar de postar então. Sem problema, eu só espero que vc tenha gostado da perspectiva da Kasdeya/Ahaiyuta e afins sobre os temas de que este blog se trata. Desculpa qualquer coisa. Eu não vou mais incomodar então. E eu achei este blog por meio de um outro blog chamado Charlatanismo Espírita que eu encontrei enquanto eu estava pesquisando por Chico Xavier no Google Imagens depois de eu ver o envolvimento do Deepak Chopra e afins com o Epstein. Peço perdão por isso, não irei mais encomodar.
Vitor Diz:
fevereiro 26th, 2026 às 8:05 PM
Enkigal, em nenhum momento te pedi para você parar de postar, eu só pedi para você mudar a forma que você posta, por exemplo, em vez de postar longuíssimos textos (e em INGLÊS), forneça um link pro texto original ou então usa alguma IA para fazer um resumo (em PORTUGUÊS). SÓ ISSO QUE PEDI. Ah, e dê algum mini feedback sobre as personalidades que você cita, porque acho que a grande maioria não tem a mínima ideia de quem você está falando.
mrh Diz:
fevereiro 27th, 2026 às 1:31 AM
Espantoso kkk, espantoso é alguém achar q isso é V.
Warad-Nammu Warad-Abzu Diz:
fevereiro 27th, 2026 às 9:37 AM
Eu me pergunto, por que não temos novos casos de materializações hoje em dia? Por que não temos novos casos de evidências para a existência do sobrenatural/paranormal? E como que isso não implica que a Ahaiyuta não tenha de fato razão que o sobrenatural/paranormal fazem parte do natural?

Tudo bem o Vitor discordar da Kasdeya, ele tem suas razões, mas então qual o problema de dizer que o sobrenatural/paranormal fazem parte do mundo natural? Não é este o objetivo da parapsicologia, provar que o sobrenatural/paranormal fazem parte do natural?

Enfim, acho estranho que não tenhamos mais casos reais de materialização hoje em dia, assim como que não temos mais casos reais de fenômenos que desafiam os nossos paradigmas científicos e de realidade hoje em dia.

Mesmo que todos estes caiam no que é natural, como diz a Ahaiyuta. Eu acho interessante que não temos mais casos de Materialização e afins como que tínhamos a 100-150 anos atrás…

Inclusive a Ahaiyuta é bastante cética quanto a estes fenômenos, e penso que ela daria uma ótima parapsicóloga, mas como ela diz, parapsicologia não dá dinheiro e estes “testes” que eles pagam para você provar algo são 99,99% das vezes staged/rigged para que os donos tenham controle total…
Vitor Diz:
fevereiro 27th, 2026 às 11:12 AM
Oi, Warad
Eu não discordei do/da Kasdeya, eu penso que o sobrenatural faz parte do mundo natural sim.

Quanto à materialização, é fraude, sem dúvida. Todas elas. Ao menos é minha conclusão até o momento.
Lucas Arruda Diz:
fevereiro 27th, 2026 às 11:26 AM
Bom dia e ótima sexta-feira, Vitor e leitores do blog.
Acredito que encontrei dois estudos pré-registrados sobre o experimento de Ganzfeld voltados à investigação da precognição, ambos traduzidos para o português pelo Vitor.
Para quem tiver interesse em ler, seguem os links com seus respectivos títulos:
Testando a Precognição e Estados Alterados de Consciência com Participantes Selecionados no Ganzfeld: Um Estudo Pré-Registrado:
https://app.box.com/s/g98mqcanhh9xtdw5dmzpxyqg3rld4t1h?
Testando a Precognição e as Alterações da Consciência com Participantes Selecionados no Ganzfeld:
https://app.box.com/s/t9z389ifxhs6bhjty5ysj08f5uzxl3tj?
Lucas Arruda Diz:
fevereiro 27th, 2026 às 12:09 PM
Em relação ao fenômeno da materialização, reconheço que uma parte significativa dos relatos provavelmente se deve a fraudes — sobretudo aqueles associados a entidades de caráter folclórico. Ainda assim, há casos específicos que, apesar de sua aparente bizarrice e da ausência de uma explicação lógica convencional, considero difíceis de descartar de forma simplista.

No que diz respeito ao fenômeno OVNI, entendo-o como inserido dentro dessa categoria de manifestações anômalas. Minha interpretação dialoga com as reflexões do físico e pesquisador Jacques Vallée, que argumenta ser improvável que civilizações oriundas de sistemas estelares distantes — a pelo menos quatro anos-luz da Terra — empregassem recursos tecnológicos extraordinários apenas para realizar manobras aéreas excêntricas, exibir comportamentos aparentemente ilógicos ou interagir de maneira episódica e confusa com seres humanos. Soma-se a isso a natureza muitas vezes aerodinamicamente incompatível desses objetos com os princípios conhecidos da física clássica.

No Brasil, dois episódios chamam particularmente minha atenção. O primeiro ocorreu em 1977, em Colares (PA), durante a chamada Operação Prato, conduzida pela Força Aérea Brasileira. Há numerosos relatos de civis — alguns dos quais apresentaram marcas físicas posteriormente examinadas por médicos que concederam entrevistas públicas — além de testemunhos de militares envolvidos na investigação, incluindo o então coronel Uyrangê Hollanda. Também existem fotografias e documentos oficiais produzidos no contexto da operação, bem como registros administrativos de autoridades locais que evidenciam o impacto do episódio na região.

É verdade que há alegações posteriores de que parte do material fotográfico teria sido manipulada; contudo, tais afirmações baseiam-se apenas em testemunhos individuais, sem apresentação de provas técnicas conclusivas. Por outro lado, permanecem os relatos médicos, os depoimentos militares e a convergência de narrativas civis, que sustentam a percepção de que algo incomum de fato ocorreu.

O segundo caso, conhecido como Noite Oficial dos OVNIs, deu-se em 1986, quando pilotos da Força Aérea Brasileira relataram a observação simultânea de objetos não identificados nos céus do país. O episódio foi amplamente divulgado pela mídia na época, incluindo áudios e registros oficiais das comunicações entre os pilotos e o comando.

Em síntese, embora eu não atribua necessariamente esses eventos à visitação extraterrestre — alinhando-me, nesse ponto, à interpretação mais ampla proposta por Vallée — considero inquietante que ocorrências dessa natureza tenham sido registradas, investigadas oficialmente e sustentadas por múltiplos testemunhos. Trata-se de um tema que, independentemente da explicação final, permanece envolto em complexidade, estranheza e questionamentos legítimos.
Warad-Nammu Diz:
fevereiro 27th, 2026 às 12:26 PM
Eu gosto do ceticismo da Ahaiyuta pois ele é genuíno. Um ceticismo saudável, que falta muito hoje em dia. Eu não posso falar por ela, mas caso quiserem falar com ela, vocês podem entrar nestes seguintes servidores do Discord, o username dela é Kasdeya__ https://discord.com/invite/QXp7juZAvP https://discord.com/invite/S9jgHDKJHX https://discord.com/invite/AyhRQQaE46 nestes servidores tem mais pessoas as quais vocês podem conversar sobre parapsicologia e afins, são servidores internacionais, então vocês vão ter que falar em inglês. Ultimamente a Kasdeya está bem inativa nas mídias sociais como um todo, então vão ter que esperar alguns dias até ela responder.
Enkigal Diz:
fevereiro 27th, 2026 às 12:27 PM
Eu gosto do ceticismo da Ahaiyuta pois ele é genuíno. Um ceticismo saudável, que falta muito hoje em dia. Eu não posso falar por ela, mas caso quiserem falar com ela, vocês podem entrar nestes seguintes servidores do Discord, o username dela é Kasdeya__ https://discord.com/invite/QXp7juZAvP https://discord.com/invite/S9jgHDKJHX https://discord.com/invite/AyhRQQaE46 nestes servidores tem mais pessoas as quais vocês podem conversar sobre parapsicologia e afins, são servidores internacionais, então vocês vão ter que falar em inglês. Ultimamente a Kasdeya está bem inativa nas mídias sociais como um todo, então vão ter que esperar alguns dias até ela responder.
Enkigal Diz:
fevereiro 27th, 2026 às 12:34 PM
Em Lucas, o que você pensa sobre as teses/teorias/hipóteses da Ahaiyuta/Kasdeya? Bem, ela é bem religiosa e espiritual no sentido dela ser devota de Enki, Aya, Abzu e Nammu. Depois você entra nos servidore do Discord em que ela está e tenta conversar com ela caso queira entrar em contato com ela, o Discord dela é Kasdeya__. Mas converse com ela em inglês, já que ela não fala português. Eu não posso falar pela Kasdeya, mas certamente você poderá trocar várias ideias boas com a Kasdeya, talvez ela leva alguns dias até te responder, mas vale a pena esperar.

Materializações Espantosas

20 respostas a “Materializações Espantosas”

Deixe seu comentário

Páginas

Arquivos

Categorias

Meta